Today, in this fast-paced world, getting neck-deep and working beyond capacity has become very normal and much revered as proof of dedication and success. Their ideals and values never fail to encourage healthy competition amongst people, further driving them to work out breaking sources both physically and psychologically. Most often, overworking is equated with ‘workaholism’, a term introduced by Oates (1971) to address an uncontrollable need to work beyond normal limits.
This is increasingly more possible with the recent advancements in communication technology which makes the line between personal life and working activities even more blurred, resulting in a clear requirement to be always-on. Those with perfectionist tendencies or those with a Type A personality, in particular, will overwork as they try to meet expectations that their people create or as they try to prove their worth.
The relentless culture of overworking can be traced back to societal perceptions of productivity and success. Many people internalize the idea that longer working hours equate to greater achievement, driven by societal praise and external validation. However, this mindset often leads to physical and emotional exhaustion, setting the stage for burnout. While the initial phases of overworking might yield a sense of accomplishment, the diminishing returns over time highlight the unsustainability of such efforts.
Read More: Burnout: Symptoms, Causes & Tips to Overcome
The Impact of Burnout
Chronic stress resulting from the workplace tends to cause emotional exhaustion, detachment, and reduced personal accomplishment which forms a psychological syndrome known as burnout. Christina Maslach narrates the erosion of engagement with work as a major characteristic of burnout. Emotional exhaustion makes one feel drained and unable or unwilling to let the energy flow toward work demands. Depersonalization allows for a cynical and detached view of responsibilities or colleagues, often with a high potential for conflicts.
Finally, diminished personal accomplishment leads individuals to feel ineffective and not valued, contributing to their negative experiences with work. Burnout has physical manifestations, including headaches, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. Extended exposure to stress initiates and maintains physiological changes in the body and disrupts the regulation of cortisol levels, resulting in reduced immunity and greater susceptibility to diseases (Melamed et al., 2006).
Besides, the human being becomes irritable and detached emotionally, with a relatively constant sense of failure; it also leads to deficient decision-making and problem-solving capacity. Such individuals later tend to isolate themselves from family and friends because of emotional unavailability as it becomes chronic.
Read More: Corporate Workplace Burnout in India and What to do about it?
Theoretical Perspectives
Numerous theories concerning dynamic psychological processes can explain overworking and burnout. Hobfoll’s Conservation of Resources (COR) theory emphasizes the centrality of resources—the time, energy, and social support-straightened out by the person seeking conservation because overwork drains the resources, rendering the person vulnerable to burnout once they run short on replenishments (Hobfoll, 1989).
More in line with the JOB DEMANDS-RESOURCES (JD-R) model is that, in many job cases, overwhelming demands, such as high workloads and time pressures, coupled with insufficient resources such as support and control in the workplace, tend to create build-up conditions for stress and burnout (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). It is when the conditions of adequacy are not applicable that deficits in the amount of resources to cobble together could create stress as well as energy depletion and disengagement.
This theory brings into perspective autonomy as well as competence and connectedness: disconnections on these accounts subsequently lead to disinterest as well as demotivation, which can make one more susceptible to burnout. For example, micromanagement or lack of recognition would negatively affect an employee’s sense of autonomy and competence, which would create stress.
Read More: How to Boost Employee Morale and Satisfaction: Psychologist Speaks
Contributing Factors
Burnout is rarely the result of a single factor; instead, it arises from a combination of workplace environment, personal characteristics, and external pressure. This combination leads to burnout, especially when unrealistic expectations and poor communications mix with the lack of support from toxic organizations. Similarly, an employee from such an environment can feel as if they would have to work more hours or take on more responsibilities to prove their worth.
Individual characteristics, including perfectionism and poor self-esteem, are also significant determinants. For instance, perfectionists usually have unrealistically high standards that lead to their overworking and unsatisfactory performance. Similarly, high anxiety levels can prompt one to overwork as a way of coping with his fears of failure. External factors can worsen the issue; societal expectations, financial limitations, and peer competition add to the list. For example, thousands of people who live in work-centric cultures end up working under immense pressure to gain priority over personal well-being.
Technology has also led to the problem of blurring personal working lines even though it has many benefits. Nowadays, with the advent of smartphones and tools for remote work, the “always-on” culture has pressured them to continue with their business after regular working hours to respond to e-mails or finish tasks. All this clear connection means one cannot have a rest and recuperation period, thus keeping up the overworking routine.
Read More: Perfectionism, Procrastination and Paralysis
Consequences of Overworking
Individual consequences: Health problems resulting from burnout usually take the forms of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and clinical depression. Also, research by Melamed et al., 2006 indicates that prolonged occupational burnout significantly determines the risk of heart disease since it heightens stress and coincides with poor coping mechanisms.
Emotionally, it reduces an individual’s resilience against mood disorders as well as feelings of hopelessness. Cognitively, it impairs creativity alongside attentiveness, thus leading to poor performance in work outputs and more errors. This usually translates to personal life in terms of excessive strains on relationships with family and friends.
For organizations, being burnt out means depressed productivity, high absenteeism, and increased turnover levels. All the given costs hamper the recruitment of new employees and their training, combined with low morale, giving rise to a “negative feedback loop” by which poor workplace culture deteriorates. Teams with high burnout usually show less collaboration and trust for more impact on organizational outcomes.
At the very macro level, there are economic losses and healthcare burdens attributed to burnout. Burnt individuals are always believed to be the ones most likely to present with stress-related illnesses thus causing more pressure on the healthcare systems. Moreover, the economy suffers such losses because burnout affects the most competent workers, which accordingly inhibits growth and innovation.
Read More: The psychology behind Coping Mechanisms
Coping Mechanisms and Prevention
It is about treating burnout and overworking, or in this instance, the interventions are at both individual and organizational levels. Description could be measured in the individual’s mindfulness practices, which include meditation and yoga. Such practices reduce stress and may also improve mental clarity. Mindfulness prepares people to live in the present, thereby detaching them from work-related stress and time management as well, realistic goals with prioritized tasks will never add overly heavy pressure to work. It could be by talking to friends or family or a mental health professional and getting some solace.
A strategic place for organisations to protect against burnout is by creating supportive work environments. Balanced hours spent at work as well as encouraging individuals to take time-outs are boundaries that have to be set by organizations. These, together with counselling access, skill development programs, and flexible work arrangements for employees, pave the way for burnout mitigation. Recognition and rewards for efforts that employees put into the organization improve morale and reduce the tendency to take compensatory actions through overworking.
Work hours must be regulated, paid leaves enforced, and wellness programs promoted. Such an example can be gleaned from the country of Sweden where an experiment was conducted with the six-hour workday and improvement in productiveness and satisfaction for workers was acquired. Emphasizing such efforts draws a lesson in the fact that the wellness of the individual matters more than mindless productivity.
Read More: Do You Think You Work Better Under Pressure?
Conclusion
It is important to understand how the psychology of overworking and burnout works to face modern work culture challenges. It is important for individuals to recognize and learn how to learn the signs of overworking, which is equally important for organizing and society’s responsibility in creating environments that will promote well-being. Addressing the root causes of overworking and burnout will lead to sustainable productivity, healthier workplaces, and a more balanced concept of achievement.
References +
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111.
Melamed, S., Shirom, A., Toker, S., Berliner, S., & Shapira, I. (2006). Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease: Evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 327–353. Oates, W. E. (1971). Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts About Work Addiction.
Leave feedback about this