The power of expectation is the greatest power we have.
George Bernard Shaw
The Pygmalion effect or the Rosenthal effect is the psychological phenomenon wherein higher expectations regarding outcomes lead to better performance. It is named after the Greek mythology of Pygmalion, who sculpted a statue that came to life. It illustrated how beliefs and expectations of teachers, leaders and even peers influence an individual’s achievement. This article explores the theoretical construction, mechanisms, implications and applications of the Pygmalion effect well-supported by research.
Origins and Theoretical Framework
The term “Pygmalion effect” was first used in the 1960s by a social psychologist, Robert Rosenthal. Through an innovative elementary school study, he discovered groundbreaking evidence. He explored how teachers’ perceptions of students’ performance significantly impacted it. The teachers were informed in advance that some students were expected to be “intellectual bloomers,” though those students had been randomly selected. As anyone would expect, bloomers displayed greater academic gains than the rest of the students.
The Pygmalion effect can be theoretically explained with the help of social and cognitive psychology. Expectancy theory indicates that individuals perform up to the level expected of them. If a teacher or leader thinks that a student or employee has the potential to become successful, he or she may provide more incentives, support, encouragement and opportunities that generate a conducive environment. Thus, leading to better outcomes.Â
Mechanisms of the Pygmalion Effect
1. Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
This effect is based on the concept of self-fulfilling prophecy wherein a belief of an individual regarding another leads to behaviors that follow through with that belief. When teachers expect certain students to perform better, they tend to spend more quality time with them, provide more detailed feedback and offer them better opportunities for participation. This makes them more confident and motivated, which in turn leads to enhanced performance.
Read More: 10 Ways to Build Self-Confidence
2. Feedback and Interaction
Feedback content and nature also play a role in the Pygmalion effect. Favourable expectations are usually associated with more constructive feedback, which instigates individuals to be highly engaged with their work. Research highlights that instructors who had a belief in the ability of their pupils provided more positive feedback thereby reinforcing their self-belief.
Read More: Does Self-Belief Unlock The Wide Range Of Potential Within You? How?
3. Social Climate
The social environment created by people with high expectations can also influence performance. For instance, in a workplace setting, an attitude adopted by a leader who believes his team has a lot of capabilities allows more space for collaboration and innovation. Not only this, it enables the employees to take risks and give their best shot. Conversely, negative expectations can also lead to a straining environment that deteriorates performance.
Applications in Various Domains
1. Education
In education, high expectations can be promoted through focused interventions. Programs can focus on training teachers how to acknowledge their personal biases and ensure that they do not make irrational judgments based on them. Also, maintaining high expectations from students yields considerable improvement in their development. Inculcation of a growth mindset within curricula helps in making students believe that their abilities can improve with effort and perseverance.Â
2. Business
In the organizational setting, this effect can be implemented by introducing human capital development training on positive leadership skills. Leaders who have high expectations and provide supportive feedback tend to build good-performance teams. Adding consistent performance evaluations that concentrate on growth potential rather than weaknesses reinforces this effect.Â
3. Sports
The Pygmalion effect has its applications even in the field of sports psychology. The firm belief of a coach in the athletes considerably boosts their performance through encouragement and strategic training methods. The athletes who are positively reinforced by their coaches perform better than those who don’t.
Implications of the Pygmalion Effect
It cuts across various fields including education, employment and social networks. At the academic level, the Pygmalion effect can be applied to enhance student learning with the help of setting a growth mindset and developing high but achievable expectations. Training programs based on the principle of positive expectations help educators understand how their beliefs may affect the student’s performance.
Leadership in the workplace can also apply the ideologies of the Pygmalion effect by creating an encouraging and supportive environment. Research highlights that high-performance expectations from leaders increase employee satisfaction, engagement and productivity. This again points out the importance of leadership development programs in developing positive expectations.
Limitations and Criticisms
Although the Pygmalion effect is highly effective, it has some limitations. Its negative counterpart often termed as the “Golem effect” wherein low expectations lead to a drop in performance is a matter of concern. A cycle of underachievement, in a nutshell, can be perpetuated amongst vulnerable groups. For instance, stereotypes about particular groups can actually lead to a lowering of expectations from teachers that ultimately brings about a fall in performance.
Another issue is that the Pygmalion effect is context-dependent. It is related to the way in which expectations are perceived and acted upon. Individual differences, cultural backgrounds, and situational variables may affect the impact of expectations on behavior. For instance, some studies have indicated that the Pygmalion effect may not be as ‘robust’ in other populations or settings. Therefore, more research is needed to better understand these dynamics.
Conclusion
The Pygmalion effect highlights the strong effect that expectations can have on performance in a wide range of domains. By effectively utilising such a phenomenon, educators, leaders and individuals may shape environments that encourage achievement and growth. Although there are severe issues, like the Golem effect and contextual conditions, such high expectations hold positive implications for enhanced performance and motivation. Continued research and practical applications of the Pygmalion effect can lead to developing strategies that bring out the best in mankind.
FAQs
What is the Pygmalion effect all about?
The Pygmalion effect is a concept whereby belief shapes reality. High expectation functions as a magic wand to turn potential into performance.
How does this magic happen?
It all happens in the realm of perception. People tend to reach their full potential when they feel that others believe in the. Their motivation takes off to incredible heights to meet other’s elevated expectations.
Can expectations backfire?Â
Absolutely! A mold which is not well fabricated can lead to the formation of an ill-formed sculpture. Similarly, poor expectations create a Golem effect that can curtail growth and restrict performance.
How can Teachers use this Power?Â
Teachers can shape the students’ potential by believing in them along with setting ambitious goals. This would help every learner perform at their fullest potential.
References +
- Babad, E. (1990). Teacher expectations: Effects on students’ academic achievement. Educational Psychologist, 25(4), 261-270.
- Brophy, J. (1983). Classroom management as socialization. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 326-338.
- Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. Review of Educational Research, 40(4), 303-323.
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine Books.
- Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From leader to follower: The role of expectations in leader-follower relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1120-1133.
- Gordon, A. (2001). Teacher expectations and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 681-688.
- Heslin, P. A., & Vandewalle, D. (2008). The effect of feedback on self-efficacy: The role of implicit and explicit beliefs. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(3), 267-284.
- Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Known and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131-155.
- Mason, M., et al. (2017). The influence of coaches’ expectations on athletes’ performance. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 48(2), 144-160.
- Rosenthal, R. (2003). The Pygmalion effect. In Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 3(1), 1-30.
- Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley.
Leave feedback about this