Picture two students with the same assignment and the same deadline. One starts early, plans it out, double-checks everything before turning it in. The other means to do the same thing, genuinely means to, but somehow never gets there. It’s not intelligence or skill that sets them apart. It typically boils down to a personality trait known as conscientiousness, or put another way, organisation, discipline and goal orientation.
Conscientiousness is one of the five principal personality traits, sometimes referred to as the “Big 5,”used by psychologists as a foundational framework for personality description. Of the five, conscientiousness is the trait that continually emerges as the greatest indicator of how lives actually unfold in school, careers, even life expectancy. Well, what is it, then? What is its source? And can you actually change it? Let’s get into it.
What Conscientiousness Really Means
It’s not really one single trait; it’s more like a bundle of related tendencies. Researchers Roberts et al. broke it down into six pieces: being orderly (liking structure and tidiness), being industrious (working hard and sticking with things), being reliable (actually doing what you said you’d do), having impulse control (thinking before you act), being conventional (following rules and norms), and being decisive (making a plan and sticking to it) (Roberts et al., 2005). You don’t need to check every one of these boxes to count as a conscientious person; they just tend to travel together.
In real life, you can probably picture what this looks like. The conscientious individual is punctual, keeps his or her desk tidy, meets deadlines and takes pains to finish work, not to leave it half-done. Someone lower in conscientiousness isn’t necessarily lazy or careless; they might be creative and spontaneous and great to be around, but they’re more likely to act on impulse, lose track of things, and struggle to think past the next few days. At its core, this trait really comes down to self-control: the ability to hold off on what you want right now for the sake of what you want later (Tangney et al., 2004).
Nature or Nurture? Bit of Both
Like most personality traits, this one comes from a mix of genes and environment. Twin studies are how psychologists tease these apart by comparing identical twins, who share all their genes, with fraternal twins, who share about half. Jang and colleagues found that genetics accounts for roughly 44% of the differences in conscientiousness between people (Jang et al., 1996).
So, half of that is nature; that is, why you’re more or less conscientious than the person sitting next to you. But the rest is from your surroundings, from where you were brought up, the organisation of your school, the friends you had when you were a child, the culture you were immersed in. Children who are taught clearly, given routines and encouragement to be responsible are more conscientious over time.
The same is true of places of work and schools which actually value planning and follow-through. Even friendships matter: Jackson et al. (2015) discovered that the perceived conscientiousness of children by their peers forecasted their health and longevity many years later, indicating the significant influence of surrounding individuals on the evolution of this characteristic. (Bogg & Roberts, 2004).
Why It Matters So Much at School and Work
Here’s the part that really jumps out from the research: conscientiousness predicts success almost everywhere you look. In school, a big meta-analysis by Poropat found that conscientiousness beat out every other personality trait as a predictor of grades at every level of education, and in some studies, it even out-predicted raw intelligence (Poropat, 2009).
Makes sense when you think about it: doing well in school takes sustained effort, staying organised, and being able to put off short-term fun for long-term payoff. That’s the whole job description of conscientiousness. Work tells the same story. BARRICK & MOUNT (1991) conducted an extensive examination of several occupations and discovered that conscientiousness was the only quality among the Big Five that consistently forecasted superior performance across all job types. Personality characteristics such as extraversion or openness were beneficial in certain jobs, while conscientiousness was beneficial in all.
Those who score high on this trait set goals and follow up on themselves, face setbacks and overcome them, and actually do what they say. As one line from the research puts it, conscientious people aren’t just working harder; they’re organised in ways that make their effort actually count.
The Surprising Link to Health and How Long You Live
Bogg & Roberts (2004) pulled together a huge meta-analysis and found that more conscientious people were significantly less likely to smoke, drink heavily, eat poorly, or use drugs. It’s not a mystery why conscientious people are just better at sticking to medical advice, keeping up healthy habits, and avoiding the impulsive choices that add up to real problems down the line.
Friedman et al. (1993) ran a long-term study following people from childhood into old age and found that kids rated as conscientious by their teachers lived noticeably longer than their peers, and that held true even after accounting for other factors. Of all the things that predict a long life, conscientiousness turns out to be one of the most reliable ones that has nothing to do with medicine at all.
Can You Actually Get More Conscientious?
Most people think that their personalities are pretty much set. Well, that’s not necessarily the case. Roberts and colleagues looked across a huge number of long-term studies and found that personality does shift over a lifetime, and conscientiousness shows one of the clearest upward trends of any trait (Roberts et al., 2006). Most people get noticeably more conscientious as they get older, especially in young adulthood, when life starts handing you real responsibilities: a career, a relationship, maybe kids.
(Soto et al., 2011) backed this up with a huge study spanning ages 10 to 65, finding that conscientiousness climbs steadily from the teenage years through middle age before it levels off later in life (Soto et al., 2011). Part of this trait is born into them; however, life experiences, in particular the responsibilities that come with adulthood, continue to shape it. For a disorganised teen, there is no permanent doom in that situation. Where there is responsibility, there is also conscientiousness, and as it increases, conscientiousness increases also.
Conclusion
Conscientiousness might be one of the most useful personality traits psychology has ever studied. It influences your school and work performance, your health and your lifespan. One part of it is something you are born with. However, a large part of it is developed by the environment you grew up in, the people you interacted with, and the responsibilities you were given in life. Here’s the encouraging part: the habits behind conscientiousness are not some fixed gifts that a lucky few are born with. These habits include planning, following through, managing your impulses, and building routines.
Research consistently shows that taking on structured responsibilities contributes to the development of more conscientious behaviour. Additionally, building habits around organisation contributes to this development. Finally, finding environments that reward follow-through also contributes to the development of more conscientious behaviour. In a world that often celebrates spontaneity, conscientious quality does some of the most important work of all. It turns intention into action and potential into outcome.
References +
- BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991). THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-6570.1991.TB00688.X
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004a). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviours: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioural contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.130.6.887
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004b). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviours: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioural contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.132.1.1
- Friedman, H. S., Tucker, J. S., Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Schwartz, J. E., Wingard, D. L., & Criqui, M. H. (1993). Does Childhood Personality Predict Longevity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 176–185.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.176
- Jackson, J. J., Connolly, J. J., Garrison, S. M., Leveille, M. M., & Connolly, S. L. (2015). Your Friends Know How Long You Will Live: A 75-Year Study of Peer-Rated Personality Traits. Psychological Science, 26(3), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614561800
- Jang, K. L., Livesley, W. J., & Vernon, P. A. (1996). Heritability of the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Their Facets: A Twin Study. Journal of Personality, 64(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6494.1996.tb00522.x; JOURNAL: JOURNAL:14676494; WGROUP:STRING: PUBLICATION
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A Meta-Analysis of the Five-Factor Model of Personality and Academic Performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0014996
- Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x; SUBPAGE:STRING:ABSTRACT; WEBSITE:WEBSITE: PERICLES; REQUESTEDJOURNAL: JOURNAL:17446570; ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
- Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age Differences in Personality Traits From 10 to 65: Big Five Domains and Facets in a Large Cross-Sectional Sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0021717
- Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022- 3506.2004.00263.x;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:14676494; WGROUP: STRING: PUBLICATION


Leave feedback about this