Reciprocal Determinism in Psychology
Awareness Self Help

Reciprocal Determinism in Psychology


Reciprocal determinism is a foundational concept in the field of psychology proposed by influential social cognitive theorist Albert Bandura. The theory states that there is never a one-way causality to human behaviour. Instead, behaviour emerges as an interactive product shaped bidirectionally by three core factors – our unique internal cognitive and emotional dispositions, observable actions as well as surrounding environmental influences. This dynamic reciprocal interplay operates across situation-specific everyday interactions as well as broader lifespan development.

This article will break down Bandura’s concept of reciprocal determinism by unpacking key factors he saw as fundamentally intertwined in their impact on human functioning – our behaviour, thoughts, beliefs, and other internal experiences as well as qualities of our immediate and distal surroundings. It will illustrate the concept through varied concrete examples. The article also explores real-world applications of reciprocal determinism and how its principles have informed impactful social cognitive models guiding education, counselling, public health programs as well as clinical interventions when psychological distress disrupts adaptive functioning.

Read More: Journey of Human Development: Domains and Stages of Development

Understanding the Concept of Reciprocal Determinism

Reciprocal determinism is a theory in psychology that states behaviour, cognition other personal factors, and environmental influences all interact and influence one another bidirectionally. This means that a person’s behaviour can influence their environment and vice versa, a person’s thoughts and beliefs can shape their actions and vice versa, and the environment plays a role in shaping a person’s way of thinking while the way a person thinks also impacts how they view their environment.

The theory was developed by psychologist Albert Bandura as part of his social cognitive theory. Bandura believed that a unidirectional causality model, where either internal factors or external factors exclusively determine behaviour, was too simplistic to fully explain human functioning. He proposed reciprocal determinism as a model that integrates multiple determinants of human behaviour in a bidirectional, reciprocal interaction.

Several key factors interact with and influence each other reciprocally according to Bandura’s theory. These include behaviour, personal factors, and environmental influences.

Read More: The Psychology Behind Choosing Your Role Models


A person’s actions and reactions have an impact on their immediate environment as well as the broader social or physical systems they are a part of. At the same time, constraints and influences from the environment shape and prompt certain behaviours over others. Some examples of this reciprocal interaction are:

  1. A person who treats others with warmth and respect at their workplace may find their colleagues act more positively and cooperatively with them over time. On the flip side, negative behaviours can prompt reactions from others that amplify interpersonal conflicts.
  2. A student who put effort into studying hard and completing their assignments will likely experience academic success and reinforcement that further motivates them to keep applying themselves.
  3. Government policies and programs can incentivize people and businesses to change behaviours and habits, like tax rebates for purchasing fuel-efficient cars or installing solar panels. The widespread adoption of the reinforced behaviours then facilitates cultural and economic shifts at a larger scale.

Read More: Psychology Meets Public Policy: Crafting a Better Tomorrow

Cognition and Other Personal Factors

A person’s way of perceiving, interpreting, and making sense of themselves and the world around them shapes their actions and experiences. But environmental factors also influence the lens through which a person views reality. Interactions with our physical and social worlds can reinforce or shift our innermost beliefs, thoughts, and emotions. Some examples are:

  1. The way parents label and react to a child’s behaviours and emotional expressions teaches the child how to categorize and judge their feelings and actions as good/bad, acceptable/unacceptable, etc. This forms the foundation for their developing self-concept.
  2. When someone faces trauma or prolonged adversity, it can shape their core beliefs about themselves, other people, and institutions. For instance, experiences of abuse can damage one’s sense of self-worth and erode trust in others to provide support.
  3. Shifting cultural narratives around topics like mental health, gender, or ethnic diversity that take hold through public discourse and media influences how people perceive themselves and each other by normalizing or condemning particular identities and lived experiences.

There are complex layers of environmental influences, including immediate settings like our workplace or school as well as broader sociocultural systems, economic policies, media representations, etc. These environmental factors play an enormous role in prompting, modelling, rewarding, and punishing certain actions and mindsets over others. But individuals and groups also shape, disrupt, and transform environments through the exercise of personal and collective agency. Some examples are:

  1. Architectural designs that make neighbourhoods more walkable encourage increased foot traffic and community bonding. In contrast, areas with little public space can inhibit positive social connection.
  2. Social norms and related pressures in peer groups during adolescence strongly reinforce certain behaviours like risky experimentation or conformity to styles of speech, clothing, etc while actively discouraging other modes of self-expression.
  3. Digital spaces and social technologies are modifying the ways we connect, learn, work, and even how we construct identity, while users simultaneously have some power to divert these technologies and reshape online environments through creative or subversive use.

There is abundant empirical evidence supporting Bandura’s model demonstrating reciprocal interactions between behaviour, internal personal factors, and environmental influences across diverse contexts – from classroom dynamics impacting a student’s academic success and confidence to emotionally abusive intimate relationships negatively impacting mental health. However reciprocal relationships will vary between individuals and across different domains of functioning.

Not all behaviours or psychological experiences alter environments to the same degree due to constraints like sealed institutional systems, extreme power differentials that limit voice, or just the inevitability of grappling with intrapersonal struggles privately. Not all environments imprint upon an individual equally either. We each have distinct biologically rooted traits and a personal history shaping psychological as well as behavioural tendencies that interact with environmental impacts. So reciprocal pathways will demonstrate differential strength and directionality for different individuals in different contexts.

Read More: How to deal with conflicts in a relationship?


There are wide-ranging everyday applications of reciprocal determinism’s conceptualization of interactively shaped behaviour and experience. Knowledge of Bandura’s theory has opened doors to a better understanding of phenomena like aggression, racial and gender bias, health behaviours as well emotional disorders – by highlighting multifaceted, reciprocally reinforcing variables sustaining dysfunctional patterns.

Targeting self-regulatory capacities or tools to restructure one’s immediate settings, rather than simply attempting to suppress troublesome thoughts or impulse control issues, may offer more effective approaches to counselling or behaviour change programs. For example, controlled exposure therapy allows a recovering addict to attempt to resist addiction triggers in an environment where relapse risks are contained. Small successes translate to cognitive shifts in self-efficacy, motivation for abstinence, and longer-term recovery.

  • In the classroom setting, teachers can structure optimal challenges, feedback processes, role models, and social comparison experiences that each elevate student motivation levels, academic skill building, as well as personal standards students, set for themselves. Creating a classroom climate focused on self-improvement rather than competitive social comparison and harsh evaluation may help hesitant students develop greater intrinsic motivation to learn through continuously reinforced effort-success linkages.
  • In public health domains, reciprocal determinism points us to multifaceted health promotion and disease prevention models – tapping behavioural, social-environmental as well as biological factors shown to reciprocally interact. For example, obesity intervention programs, along with guidance on diet and exercise, might incorporate reconstruction of home or community spaces to facilitate access and incentives promoting daily physical activity while reducing sedentary habits.
  • Within clinical psychology frameworks like cognitive behavioural therapy, reciprocal pathways are well mapped. Identifying and altering cognitive as well as behavioural patterns around mood, anxiety, substance issues or disordered eating works hand in hand. Retraining mental habits prompts new emotionally laden experiences that reinforce constructive ways of thinking. Adjusting behaviours provides feedback loosening the grip of destructive thought patterns.

Read More: 8 Techniques from Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Positive Change

Summing Up

In conclusion, reciprocal determinism gives us a framework recognizing human functioning and experience emerges out of an interconnected web of influence between behaviour, internal cognitive/affective factors unique to the individual as well as qualities of their surrounding environmental contexts – embedded within family dynamics, peer groups, cultural systems, and structural policies. Appreciating multiple bidirectional pathways shaping and sustaining behaviours allows us to develop more sensitive, holistic models for understanding everyday functioning as well as modes of intervening when individuals struggle with psychological problems or behave in harmful ways.

Read More Articles on Psychologs

References +
  • Bandura, A. (1978). The self-system in reciprocal determinism. American psychologist, 33(4), 344.
  • Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Ed.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford Publications.
  • Davidson Films, Inc. (Director). (2003). Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory: An Introduction [Motion Picture]. United States.
  • Pajares (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved from

Leave feedback about this

  • Rating