Why Safety Feels Different for Men and Women in Cities

The relationship between fear and safety is significantly linked with gender through cultural constructs that define threat perceptions. Fear is not a personal emotion but rather a social one that varies by gender due to socialisation. Women are more likely to report fear of city crime compared to men (Haandrikman & Johansson, 2023), which highlights the importance of examining how gender makes a difference in perceptions of safety.

Gender disparities have a significant impact on how individuals circulate in public spaces, with women displaying more risk-averse tendencies driven by fear of abuse or harassment (Cui et al., 2023). This is also supported by discourses in society that present women as weak, socialised by the use of power, placing men as the perpetrators (Stevens et al., 2024, pp. 1-5).

Urban environments create special circumstances that accentuate such gendered experiences. Circumstances such as lighting, visibility, and pedestrian traffic affect women’s feelings of safety so that they can be in danger even when they are in neighbourhoods with low crime (Little et al., 2005). Men are more likely to move through such spaces with confidence since there are differential societal expectations of vulnerability.

Breaking down fear along a gendered axis is crucial to guide effective interventions to enhance security for all. It is possible to identify these differences so that interventions can be made specifically to address the respective needs of each gender group and make community spaces more secure in which all can feel secure. This gender-fear intersection needs to be studied further and applied to public policy to maximise social security architecture.

Read More: Gendered Expectations in India: Why Sons Inherit and Daughters Nurture

Social Conditioning and Psychological Development

Social conditioning plays a significant role in shaping gendered perceptions of danger and safety. Cultural narratives regulate suitable actions, influencing how individuals conceptualise threats. Men are often viewed as protectors, symbolising strength, while women are associated with vulnerability and nurturing. The assumption primarily leads to women becoming more afraid, particularly in public, as they are viewed as potential victims of aggression (Haandrikman & Johansson, 2023).

Media images compound these worries still further by depicting women as victims and idealising male heroes who endure hardships. Such a depiction confirms psychological theorising that apprehensions are socially constructed rather than exclusively biological. For example, attachment theory asserts that emotional response in the course of a lifetime is influenced by early interactions with carers; therefore, individuals raised with outdated feminine expectations internalise heightened vulnerability (Chaplin, 2015).

Moreover, social learning theory explains that behaviour is acquired through imitation, with gender roles being taught to children by family, peers, and media. Boys can imitate courageous male role models, while girls learn from female models who act with caution or fear. This is a pattern that can encourage boys to confirm masculinity through risk-taking and frighten girls from risk-taking situations.

Gender role intersectionality knowledge shows there to be a multilateral space of fear responses based on structural differences, for example, race and class (Haandrikman & Johansson, 2023). Such disparities necessitate gender-sensitive interventions that can maximise perceptions of safety among groups.

Gendered Behaviours in Urban Spaces

In city spaces, they experience safety and fear differently, most noticeably in public transportation. One study reports 63% of women perceiving various situations on the street as unsafe compared to only 23% of men, indicating a significant difference in safety perceptions (Cui et al., 2023). The difference makes women adopt certain safety precautions, such as knowing where they are going and travelling in groups when able to do so.

Men have quite different risk perceptions; society advises them to take risks, and hence, they do not alter their commuting style even if a threat exists (Caparrós, 2024). While women will not travel along certain streets in the evenings since they are fearful, men do not typically alter their means of travel.

The nightlife also adds to the complexity, as dim lighting and large crowds enhance women’s anxieties of being harassed or raped (Kelly & Vera-Grey, 2020). Women overstay their welcome, always looking out for threats and employing techniques like avoiding eye contact or keeping mobiles on standby in case of needing to make an urgent call.

Conversely, men may be engaged in night risk-taking behaviours that may enhance threat perceptions for women. Male assertiveness socialisation tends to cause men to disregard others’ perception of safety from their own behaviour (Caparrós, 2024). The experiences in general illustrate broader problems of social interest about gender relations and the use of public spaces.

Internally Constructed Perceptions of Threat

Internally constructed perceptions of threat significantly influence gendered threat responses. Women have been found to experience higher levels of fear and anxiety because they were socialised within a patriarchal context, and they have certain concerns about personal safety in the public sphere, which are constructed based on the occurrence of harassment (Miles et al., 2025). This behaviour, called “safety work,” involves avoiding certain places or changing routines to reduce perceived danger.

Cross-cultural studies find certain challenges for women, such as those in urban settings like Malaga, commuting through public places to work and being at risk of violence (Caparrós, 2024). These make them complicated in their level of anxiety. Women are shown to have higher emotional reactions and employ coping mechanisms that differ from men, prioritising risk assessment and planned safety, making them proactive despite constraints in society.

In contrast, society socialises men to suppress expressions of fear, which results in fewer obvious emotional responses to threats. They often downplay threats rather than confronting underlying fears, leading them to engage in risk-taking behaviours or hostile tactics.

These gendered responses have powerful psychological implications; women’s experiences work towards a generalised sense of vulnerability across much of life. Danger in the internet space also adds to women’s fear profiles, increasing anxiety and causing protective behaviour. Ultimately, internalised threat feelings create various emotional climates within genders.

Addressing the Gender Gap in Safety Perceptions and Fear Management Strategies

A comprehensive strategy is essential to address gender disparities in safety perception. Urban design must be combined with gender-related considerations, as pointed out by Cui and associates, to enhance the safety feeling of women since they perceive urban areas as riskier than men (Cui et al., 2023). Planners can use Feminist Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to analyse spatial data from women’s experiences and design safer urban spaces.

Involving women in evaluating urban safety is important because their perspectives highlight weaknesses that men may overlook. Research has established that what is safe to men may be dangerous to women; paying more attention to the opinions of women has the capacity to rethink public space (Cui et al., 2023). Creating pedestrian space with adequate lighting and visibility can encourage women to be more confident about navigating such areas.

In addition, enabling the free discussion of gendered experience in fear is critical. Public forums where individuals share their experiences can validate women’s experiences and inform local authorities of immediate safety issues. Miles et al. underscore the importance of being aware of women’s fear of public exercise spaces and posit that collective stories can aid effective prevention (Miles et al., 2025).

Education within communities regarding the structural reasons for women’s fears is also crucial. Gender sensitisation campaigns among both individuals could promote sympathy and collective responsibility towards safer neighbourhoods. Gender-sensitive city planning, facilitating women’s participation, and opening channels of dialogue. Producing education can assist cities in making a strong effort to bridge the gap between safety perceptions.

Read More: The Impact of Domestic Violence on Women’s Mental Health

Conclusion

The interplay among gender, fear, and safety unmasks an entrenched social. Psychological construct that transcends personal emotion to touch on wider cultural narratives and structural disparities. Women’s increased sense of danger, their preoccupation with “safety work,”. Their limited mobility in public and private spaces is not simply personal incidents but consequences of entrenched patriarchal conditioning reinforced by media, urban planning, and social norms.

Men, on the other hand, are taught to downplay fear and be assertive, thereby creating a feedback loop that enhances women’s vulnerability and the normalisation of men’s dangerous practices. Closing this gender gap requires structural and cultural interventions, including gender-responsive urban planning and civic engagement to ensure women’s participation in policymaking. Education programs that rupture deeply ingrained vulnerability and masculinity stereotypes.