We’ve all watched it unfold on the screen. One character, on the verge of giving up on life, has an encounter with someone new who fills them with unwavering love, and everything’s rosy again. It’s the standard love story; love as a cure for all, the mystical potion that makes him complete. However, that isn’t how genuine relationships work.
The social pressure to heal, our own being uncomfortable with weakness, or the simple fact that we don’t know how to communicate pain and provide genuine emotional support are the main causes of this reaction, whether thoughtful or not (and frequently it is). It is more harmful than beneficial to constantly try to “fix” your partner. From the perspective of mental health, this feeling reflects a common but false opinion: that love is only valuable when it results in change and that ordinary emotional difficulties should be treated as problems.
Read More: The Psychology Behind Always Wanting to “Fix” People
Why We Want to ‘Fix’ People
From a psychological perspective, “wanting to fix” the partner is often the result of something called the savior complex, which is when we feel a strong need to save others for the purpose of feeling important and in control (Reynolds, 2011). People with this mindset frequently go looking for emotionally damaged partners, believing that love can transform.
For many, however, this longing masks a deeper anxiety about not knowing, not having control, and not feeling safe in emotional ambivalence. Those with anxious attachment styles may also react more when their partner is upset. They might interpret emotional pain as evidence that the relationship is crumbling and seek to stop the rot (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). For them, fixing the problem is a way to calm their own anxiety. But what they are offering isn’t genuine empathy; it’s more like soothing their own fears.
Read More: What do Ambivalent People Actually Feel?
When Feelings Are Seen as Flaws
In a society that is obsessed with praise and success, being positive as well as being a master of your emotions, anything other than those attributes is considered broken or wrong. This perspective impacts our romantic relationships, too. Issues like anxiety, depression, trauma, or even shyness can be wrongfully classified as faults needing correction.
The medical model of mental health, which is most of society’s approach towards emotional concerns, tends to support this notion. It considers symptoms as challenges that need to be addressed (Pilgrim, 2014). This is why a partner may jump to “fix it” mode, attending to what they may perceive to be a low moment. Not all pain requires action; some simply needs understanding.
The attempt communicates an encouraging, fixable-symptoms approach, something that ironically fails behind the scenes. Deeply, that sends the signal, “You’re only valuable when there is something to be improved.” This wears down on mental health, leading to a sense of being reduced to a project or reduced to conditional worth. The attempt erodes self-esteem, leading to emotional dishonesty.
The Emotional Toll of Always Being ‘Helped’
To feel someone is always trying to “fix” you can have a lasting impact on your mental health. Feeling judged or dismissed in some way can lead to profound feelings of shame and turmoil regarding one’s identity (Linehan, 1993). Partners often subtly communicate non-deserving praise by masking care with advice and listening only to “fix” issues. Thus advising them, “You shouldn’t feel like this.” As a result, many put on emotional masks and stop the process of being vulnerable entirely. When a gap emerges between expression and feeling, the individuals start to experience frustration and resentment. Irrespective of the partner caring, the care seems conditional; they may appreciate the partner’s care, but feel that care is tied to a condition: they must change to be loved.
Read More: Between Love and Resentment: The Emotional Journey of Siblings of Children with Special Needs
What Real Support Looks Like
Emotionally Focused Therapy suggests that rather than trying to solve problems, softly sensing, understanding, and responding to someone’s emotions fosters stronger connections (Johnson, 2004). Repairing should not outshine supportive presence. An understanding partner can inquire, “Would you prefer for me to help you, or do you simply want me to listen?”
Before proposing solutions. Or it may be, “How can I help you and find out what’s going on an emotional level?” Asking questions like these conveys concern in addition to changing the dynamic. It communicates to the other person that “you matter and are seen.” And sometimes, that’s what people most need to feel recognised right then and there. They also keep the focus on connection rather than correction.
Letting Go of the Fixer Role
Understanding the distinction between aiding and supporting someone and trying to rescue them is crucial. Compassion is valuable in a relationship when properly distributed; no individual should bear the entire responsibility for their partner’s healing. This defines the boundaries needed in a relationship. Psychologist Brené Brown (2012) highlights, “When there are no limits to empathy, there is a risk of emotional burnout.” Being independent is not what support is all about; it’s being honest about what you both need and knowing when to speak up, back off, or ask for support.
Healing Doesn’t Follow a Straight Line
The journey toward healing is a powerful reality that must be accepted; it is not linear. It will have progress, plateaus, and sometimes feel like going backwards. That is simply indicative of humanity, not failure. Accepting the truth shortens the distance from love shaped by outcomes toward love shaped by presence. Instead of perceiving their partners as broken individuals requiring and awaiting repair, they identify them as whole, who occasionally need someone to accompany them through the darkness.
Read More: Why “Fixing Yourself” Might Be a Capitalist Trap
Choosing Partnership, Not Perfection
Love is neither a task to do nor a list to follow. Its foundations are security, understanding, and respect for one another. When both individuals show up and accomplish more than things, true love blooms. It stops control and presence. Also, it shows up with presence and connection. It pushes the notion that emotional “wellness” is the end goal and encourages us to meet each other amid change and messiness, and reminds us that we are still worthy.
Everyone needs to feel accepted when they’re at their worst. The healthiest relationships, from a psychologist’s point of view, aren’t marked by an absence of issues but rather by the ability to embrace vulnerability. Try sitting with your partner the next time they share something challenging with you, rather than grabbing for the answer right away. Show them that you love them regardless of their difficulties.
FAQs
1. Why is trying to “fix” a partner harmful in a relationship?
It can make them feel like a problem rather than a person, leading to shame and emotional disconnection.
2. What psychological pattern drives the urge to fix others?
Often, it stems from a saviour complex or anxious attachment, where fixing becomes a form of self-soothing.
3. How does society influence the idea that people need to be cured?
Social norms glorify emotional control and wellness, pathologising normal struggles as flaws.
4. What does healthy support look like in a relationship?
It involves listening, validating emotions, and offering presence without judgment or solutions.
5. What’s the risk of constantly offering advice instead of empathy?
It can lead to emotional invalidation, where partners stop expressing their true feelings.
6. Is it wrong to want your partner to seek help or grow?
Not at all, but growth should be self-driven, supported by compassion, not control.
References +
Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. Gotham Books. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL26630004M/Daring_Greatly
Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843871
Johnson, S. M. (2007). The contribution of emotionally focused couples therapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-006-9034-9
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press. https://archive.org/details/cognitivebehavio0000line
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press. https://archive.org/details/attachmentinadul0000miku
Pilgrim, D. (2014). Key concepts in mental health (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/key-concepts-in-mental-health/book240858
Reynolds, A. L. (2011). The saviour complex and the counsellor: Balancing roles and responsibilities. Journal of Counselling and Development, 89(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00075.x
Leave feedback about this