Polite Disempowerment: Sounds like Empathy but feels like a Dead End
Awareness

Polite Disempowerment: Sounds like Empathy but feels like a Dead End

polite-disempowerment-sounds-like-empathy-but-feels-like-a-dead-end

We live in an age where parenting and teaching have never been more thoughtful, informed, or emotionally intelligent. But sometimes, in our efforts to be gentle, mindful, and respectful, we miss something very important: power. Not the harsh, dominating kind—but the kind that gives someone else a sense of agency. And this is where a subtle, unspoken pattern creeps in something that has been recently figured and is called polite disempowerment.

Polite disempowerment is when adults, especially caregivers and teachers, speak to children in emotionally intelligent and respectful ways but still they tend to override or subtly dismiss the child’s input. The words sound kind, but the outcome still centers adult control. It sounds like a contradiction, right? How can something polite be disempowering?

Imagine this: A child says, “I’m scared of going to the doctor.” The parent responds, “I hear you. Your feelings are valid. But we’re going anyway.” It’s calm. It’s warm. It’s gentle. But to the child, it might quietly translate into, “So… being heard changes nothing?”

This isn’t abuse. It isn’t neglect. But it’s confusing. Over time, it can send a message: your voice matters emotionally but not practically. For children with neurodevelopmental differences like ADHD, autism, or sensory processing sensitivities this becomes even more layered. These children often experience the world more intensely. Their discomforts are real, their routines are sacred, and their challenges are often misunderstood by the world. When they express distress, it’s not about being difficult. It’s about surviving something that feels overwhelming.

But even in our attempts to support them gently, we might say, “I know this is hard for you, but this is how it has to be.” Or, “You don’t like noise, but we need to attend the party.” Or, “You’re overwhelmed, let’s take deep breaths… Now go.” The words are soft. The tone is validating. But the power dynamic doesn’t shift.

What happens then? The child begins to associate being heard with no real change. The adult feels they’re doing everything right and yet, connection and cooperation remain elusive. This creates what we can call an empathy loop without a door.

So to break these loops, many parents and educators now have started to lean on Social Emotional Learning (SEL). It’s a powerful tool that helps children name their feelings, regulate their emotions, and navigate relationships. But here’s the paradox: SEL language can become another tool for polite disempowerment if it’s not backed by shared agency.

When adults say things like, “I see you’re frustrated, but we’ll keep doing it this way,” or “I understand your feelings, but you still have to attend the wedding function with us,” children quickly learn to perform emotional literacy instead of practicing it. They may say what adults want to hear, use feeling words but hide their true boundaries, smile through discomfort because they were ‘heard.’ In such cases, SEL becomes a script and not a skill.

True SEL means making space for uncomfortable truths, allowing children to challenge norms respectfully, and admitting when adult decisions need to adapt. It’s not just about helping children cope with emotions, but also helping them co-create decisions. Why do caring adults still fall into this? Because they care. Because they don’t want to repeat the mistakes of adults who dismissed them when they were little. But somewhere in the process, we often confuse emotional validation with emotional equality.

And that’s hard. It’s hard to sit with a child’s big emotions. It’s hard to rethink a plan because a 7-year-old says it’s unfair. It’s hard to accept that the power we hold might be getting in the way of trust. So instead, we default to the safe middle: speak kindly, stay composed, keep the original plan. This is where polite disempowerment creeps in, gently, quietly, and with good intentions.

Is it always wrong? Not at all. There are many moments where polite disempowerment isn’t just necessary it’s non-negotiable. A child must take a vaccination, even if they’re mid- meltdown. Bedtime routines must be followed for everyone’s wellbeing. School rules sometimes need to be upheld, even if unfairness is felt.

But the danger arises when this becomes the default mode when empathy is offered without influence, when warmth is given without real negotiation, when kindness masks a refusal to share power. So how do we break this pattern? How do we teach respect while embodying it?

We begin by checking the impact, not just the intention. You may mean well, but how does your child feel afterward? Do they feel more connected? More powerful? Or they just feel heard and overridden?

Then we allow negotiation wherever possible. Even if it’s small. Let them choose which shoe to wear, how many more minutes until cleanup, or what part of the day they want to start with. Micro-decisions build macro-agency. We clarify who has the final say and why. Instead of pretending it’s mutual when it’s not, be honest: “I’m making this decision, and here’s why. But I still want to know what you’d do differently.” This helps children understand real-life power dynamics and builds emotional flexibility.

To spot polite disempowerment in ourselves, we need to reflect on how our feelings were handled as children. Ask yourself if we’re using therapy language to shield hard truths. Check whether we are truly connecting or controlling more softly. This isn’t about guilt. It is more about growth and mainly about upgrading the way we lead, not softening the way we dominate.

When we get it right, children blossom. They speak more honestly and most importantly thet start trusting their gut. They learn how to use power in healthy ways because they’ve seen it being modelled with care. Especially in the world of neurodevelopmental disorders where things are often seen and felt in black and white dynamics but this shift in narrative may change everything.

Polite disempowerment, when unchecked, adds another layer of confusion to children who already live in a complex sensory and emotional world. But when we notice it, name it, and challenge it, we begin walking a new path which is directed to a path of trust, of cooperation, of shared authorship over emotions and outcomes. We stop just raising children. We start raising humans who can think, speak, and feel with confidence.

Polite disempowerment is furtive. It hides behind gentle tones and parenting best practices. But once you see it, it can’t be unseen. But here is the good news, as and when you’ve developed an insight it not that you have to start from scratch because you being the supportive kind you’re already halfway there towards the change. As a parent you want your kindness to mean more than just tone. You want your respect to become real power. You are seeking more and more solutions to give the best as a parent. That’s when parenting becomes not just about managing behaviour but about building humans who listen, respect and radiate the kindness they have been explored to. That’s where power becomes love.

References +

Omorogiuwa, Tracy & Recent, & In,. (2021). Power dynamics in parent-child relationships: a child labour dilemma. Social Work and Education. 8. 373-384. 10.25128/2520-6230.21.3.6.

Lundahl, Brad. (2009). D. J. Siegel, M. Hartzell: Parenting from the Inside Out: How a Deeper Self-Understanding Can Help You Raise Children Who Thrive. Clinical Social Work Journal – CLIN SOC WORK J. 37. 262-263. 10.1007/s10615-009-0226-0.

White, Susan & Koenig, Kathleen & Scahill, Lawrence. (2007). Social Skills Development in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of the Intervention Research. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 37. 1858-68. 10.1007/s10803-006-0320-x.

Zins, J.E. & Elias, Maurice. (2006). Social and emotional learning. Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention. 1-13.

...

Leave feedback about this

  • Rating