The Existential Shift: How Gen Z Is Redefining Success, Purpose, and Work-Life Balance
Social

The Existential Shift: How Gen Z Is Redefining Success, Purpose, and Work-Life Balance

the-existential-shift-how-gen-z-is-redefining-success-purpose-and-work-life-balance

A new generation is now changing the meaning of success. For many Gen Z individuals, earning a large salary is no longer the main goal. They now prioritise purpose, balance, and authenticity in their lives. This change moves away from the old idea of “just living”. Instead, it focuses on the deeper need to “find a life” filled with meaning, not just material possessions (Vyas et al., 2020; Waworuntu et al., 2022). 

This search for purpose is a key concept in psychology. Experts have long described a fundamental human “will to meaning”. Gen Z’s desire for authentic work reflects a natural resistance to a life that feels empty. Modern challenges like economic worries and digital connection have strengthened this need (Riyanto et al., 2020).  Ultimately, this shift is more of a reflection than a rebellion. It represents a collective awakening to a simple truth: true fulfilment comes when work aligns with who you are. This evolving definition of success is not about avoiding hard work. It is a powerful return to being human in the most authentic sense. 

Read More: Importance of Finding Passion and Purpose in Life

The Existential Roots of Why Meaning Matters 

Long before people discussed burnout, experts understood that humans need more than just survival. They have a deep need to find meaning in life. This idea is the foundation of existential psychology, which suggests that life becomes valuable when people live with purpose and own their choices (Koole et al., 2010). As one expert noted, this is an “innate motivation to find purpose”, even during hard times (Frankl, 1985). 

This search’s meaning is psychological necessity, not a luxury. Without a sense of purpose, individuals can feel lost and disconnected from their lives. Studies on existential life show that work is a key area for this search, as it is where personal identity and choice come together (MacMillan, 2009). A job that lacks personal importance can weaken a person’s sense of self. 

This concept strongly connects with Gen Z. This generation often rejects overwork as it does not provide inner fulfilment. This desire for purposeful work mirrors the core human struggle to live an authentic life despite outside pressure (Frankl, 1985). Research found that workplace fatigue often comes not from laziness but from a system that has lost its meaning (Levenson, 2017). Therefore, this generation’s focus on purpose is a psychological step towards a more authentic way of living. 

Read More: Humanistic and Existential Psychology: Foundations, Philosophies, and Contributions

Gen Z in Context, Growing Up in Crises and Connection

Generation Z has grown up in a world of constant changes and digital overload. They are the first true digital natives, experiencing both rapid connection and stress from social comparison and global uncertainty. This environment has made them more aware of mental health and self-identity. Their focus on psychological balance is not rejection of work, but a direct result of the world they live in (Waworuntu et al., 2022; Vyas et al., 2020). 

This generation also faces economic and environmental worries, erasing the lines between their online and real self. This creates a struggle to stay authentic while facing social pressures, a challenge experts have described (Koole et al., 2010). This situation can lead to emptiness, where having many options and comfort does not provide a sense of direction. When personal values do not match the expectations of their workplace, it leads to a deep, systematic fatigue. For Gen Z, finding meaning comes from seeing work as a part of fulfilling life, not something separate from it. Their demand for balance is a modern answer to the timeless question of how to live a meaningful life. 

The Demand for Work-Life Integration 

The old model of work-life balance kept a person’s job and personal life in separate boxes. Generation Z is challenging this separation. They see work as a part of their identity and seek harmony between all parts of their life, not a strict division. Research shows this generation prefers flexible schedules, mental health support, and meaningful work over rigid corporate structure. This reflects a deeper need to live as one authentic person, whether at work or at home (Waworuntu et al., 2022). 

For Gen Z, success is not about job security alone, but about how well the job aligns with their personal values. When this alignment is missing, it leads to exhaustion that comes from systems that ignore the human need for purpose and control (Levenson, 2017). This generation is most motivated by trust and flexibility, which allows them to blend their work with their personal growth. Ultimately, their push for integration is a search for a life where what they do for a job matches who they are as people (Koole et al., 2010). 

Read More: Work-Life Balance Obsession in Gen Z: Causes and Psychological Effects  

The Psychological Undercurrents of Autonomy, Authenticity, and Anxiety 

The push for flexible work is rooted in deeper psychological needs. According to existential psychology, having freedom and choice naturally comes with a degree of anxiety. While having options is empowering, it also brings the stress of making the right decision. For Gen Z, they have grown up with endless digital choices; this freedom can feel overwhelming. The pressure to build a perfect life from so many options can create a sense of anxiety that feels directionless (Koole et al., 2010). 

Living authentically means acting based on one’s own values, not for the approval of others. However, maintaining this authenticity in a world of constant online comparison is difficult. A meaningless job can cause burnout, as constantly being busy is mistaken for fulfilment. This creates a core conflict for Gen Z, who desire independence but fear the emptiness it may bring. Ultimately, true motivation is found where freedom meets supportive guidance (Riyanto et al., 2020). 

Corporates Reality Check, are Organisations Listening 

Many companies today talk about supporting employee well-being, but their actions often do not match their words. While they may offer wellness programs or flexible work, their efforts can feel superficial if the company’s culture does not truly support it. If employees see these programs as just for show, it leads to distrust and disengagement. Work fatigue is often a sign of deeper problems in the work environment (Gubler et al., 2017). 

Generation Z is quick to notice when a workplace does not value their emotional well-being or personal growth. They see such environments as inauthentic and disconnected from a real purpose (Waworuntu et al., 2022). True motivation comes from a work culture built on trust and flexibility, not control. When a person’s inner values align with their work role, it creates a space for genuine self-expression and turns routine tasks into meaningful work (MacMillan, 2009). 

Read More: 9 Tips to Ensure a Positive Work Environment

Reclaiming the Human Element towards a Purposeful Work Culture 

Creating workplaces based on empathy and purpose is now essential. Companies perform better when they see employees as whole people with inner lives, not just as resources. Studies show that programs supporting health and social responsibility improve both well-being and performance (Gubler et al., 2017).  Work becomes meaningful when it aligns with a person’s evolving sense of self. People feel truly engaged when they believe their efforts contribute to something larger, fulfilling a basic human need for purpose (Frankl, 1985). 

Lasting motivation requires deep, systemic change, not just short-term wellness programs. Engagement grows when leaders support employee autonomy with trust, not control (Riyanto et al., 2020). By combining purposeful leadership with empathetic practices, work can regain its human dimension, making success a shared and meaningful experience. 

Read More: The Four Perspectives That Shape Human Motivation

Conclusion 

Gen Z’s push for meaningful work is not a rebellion, but a powerful awakening. In a complex world, this generation is asking a fundamental question: what makes a life worth living? Their focus on balance and well-being reflects the idea that life’s challenges are easier to face when one has a sense of purpose. The modern workplace has become the main stage for this search for meaning. 

This generation is not avoiding work; they are trying to make it more human. They believe that true, lasting success happens when being productive does not come at the cost of personal fulfilment (Waworuntu et al., 2022; Riyanto et al., 2020). Fatigue often stems from work that ignores core human values. By building workplaces that value empathy, autonomy, and purpose, the old separation between “making a living” and “finding a life” disappears. This integration is Gen Z’s quiet revolution—turning work into a source of meaning. 

FAQs

1. Why does Gen Z care more about purpose than salary? 

For many in Generation Z, success is defined by personal fulfilment and mental well-being, not just financial gain. Research suggests this generation seeks work that aligns with their inner values and provides a sense of meaning, which they view as essential for a balanced life. 

2. How can companies better support Gen Z employees? 

Support involves moving beyond superficial perks. Gen Z thrives in flexible, trust-based environments that respect their autonomy and need for authentic self-expression. Studies show that engagement increases when companies offer genuine flexibility and align workplace culture with human values. 

3. Is Gen Z’s focus on work-life balance a rejection of hard work? 

No, it is a redefinition of success. This generation is not opposed to hard work but seeks to integrate it with their personal life and identity. They want their work to contribute to a meaningful life, preventing burnout and creating sustainable motivation.

References +

Baicker, K., Cutler, D., & Song, Z. (2010). Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Affairs, 29(2), 304–311. 

Beehr, T. A. (2014). Psychological stress in the workplace (Psychology Revivals ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 1998) 

Gubler, T., Larkin, I., & Pierce, L. (2017). Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Management Science. Advance online publication. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811785 

Koole, S. L., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2010). Existential psychology. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 541–580). Wiley. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228014843_Existential_Psychology 

Levenson, A. (2017). Workplace fatigue is a systems problem. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000082 

MacMillan, S. (2009). Towards an existential approach to the meaning of work [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. ISBN 978-0-494-55981-9 

Riyanto, S., Endri, E., & Herlisha, N. (2020). The impact of work-life balance on employee engagement in Generation Z. Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(1), 1–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343391235 

Uenal, Z. (2017). Varoluşsal güdülenme, anlam arayışı, anlamlı işin yaşamın anlamına katkısı [Existential motivation, search for meaning, and the contribution of meaningful work to life’s meaning]. Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 6(1), 45–60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317608178

Vyas, S., Patel, K., & Jain, D. (2020). Study of work values of Gen Z students. International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 9(12), 555–566. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347731934

Waworuntu, E. C., Kainde, S. J. R., & Mandagi, D. W. (2022). Work-life balance, job satisfaction and performance among millennial and Gen Z employees: A systematic review. Society, 10(2), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v10i2.464

...

Leave feedback about this

  • Rating