Human beings usually tend to show off or have a drive to appear better than others. This behaviour is backed by social, cultural, and evolutionary mechanisms. We show off through material possessions, social media posts, or even professionally promoting ourselves, often in an attempt to elevate our status in society. This drive of ours is shaped by my various psychological processes, such as status seeking, social comparison, and impression management. These processes reinforce identity and social standing (Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Wang, Y., 2016).
Status Seeking and Self-Presentation
At the very foundation of the attempt taken to show off lies the desire for status. Across most societies, higher status gives way to benefits such as better resources, mating opportunities, and most importantly, greater influence in the said society, which ultimately leads to power. As is seen in evolutionary models across centuries, those who have more competence and wealth are seen to have more allies and survive competition (Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Wang, Y., 2016).
People have been taught and hardwired to strategically emphasise their strengths and downplay any weakness to get favourable responses from people around them. This is mostly seen in professional settings such as job interviews and performance reviews. However, it is not limited to just that. In personal interactions, people might flaunt things such as extravagant vacations, luxury brands, and high academic scores to command envy or respect.
Read More: Trapped in Social Comparison?: The Psychology Behind Luxury Consumption
Social Comparison Theory
The social comparison theory is one of the most influential frameworks that helps us understand why people feel compelled to show off (Dinh, T.C.T., Lee, Y., 2025). It was proposed by Leon Festinger, and it talks about how people evaluate themselves through comparing themselves to other people they meet or surround themselves with. The comparisons can be of two types:
- Upward comparisons: Looking at people who are “better off” in terms of wealth, beauty, or success. This type of comparison can help with motivation to do better. However, it could also induce feelings of inadequacy or the fear of missing out.
- Downward comparisons: Looking at those thought to be less fortunate or less successful. This kind of comparison helps boost self-esteem and self-worth (Lee, B.K., Suh, T., & Sierra, J.J., 2019).
Upward comparisons can be pervasive in nature, especially due to contributory factors like social media presence. Thus, people might feel compelled to present themselves in particular ways to close the perceived gaps. Showing off, then, is not merely about arrogance; it is often an individual’s defensive strategy to shield self-esteem (Dinh, T.C.T., Lee, Y., 2025).
The Digital Age and Amplified Self-Promotion
Social media has been successful in radically amplifying the psychology of showing off. Platforms like Instagram, Facebook, etc, often showcase people flaunting luxury purchases and carefully staged moments of life that seem to be perfect. Unlike earlier times, when social media was not as big as it is today, status maintenance was limited only to immediate social circles. Global media brought an event of public self-presentation (Taylor, D.G., Strutton, D., 2016).
- Filters and editing tools allow individuals to edit perceived imperfections, presenting an “ideal self” that may not be in line with reality at all.
- Conspicuous consumption is often seen in posts about vacations, gadgets, or branded possessions such as purses, clothes, shoes, etc.
- Validation loops (likes, comments, shares) reinforce and reward these behaviours.
Thus, digital showing off is both a coping mechanism and a source of long-term dissatisfaction (Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Wang, Y., 2016). While curated images garner positive feedback that results in immediate gratification, they also intensify self-critical comparison.
Read More: The Filtered Self: How Social Media Shapes Our Body Image and Mental Health
Impression Management: Balancing Competence and Likability
Impression management involves trying to constantly strike a balance between appearing competent and being perceived as warm and likeable. Tactics such as “humblebragging” attempt reconciliation between self‐promotion and modesty. While self‐promotion serves to highlight one’s achievements and competence, overt demonstration of these qualities can trigger social backlash if perceived as arrogance or insincerity. Consequently, individuals often intertwine self‐promotion with ingratiation strategies to manage this delicate equilibrium and secure both respect and acceptance from their peers (Sezer, O., 2022; Swencionis, J. K., Dupree, C. H., & Fiske, S. T., 2017).
Professional Settings and the Risks of Overstatement
Professional contexts demand the need to appear better. As a result, in situations of interviews, appraisals, or networking, individuals may exaggerate their qualifications, highlighting only their best achievements or even going as far as fabricating accomplishments.
Tactics like these may help secure short-term advantages, but they may also cause ethical dilemmas. Fabricated self-presentation would mean a loss of credibility if exposed. Another factor to consider is cultural or gender norms. For instance, self-promotion in men is often thought to be a marker of confidence, while women in similar situations face backlash for violating norms of modesty and humility (Rudman, L. A., 1998). These double standards force women to remain subdued in professional settings.
Self-Esteem and Identity Formation
More than just seeking validation, showing off is inherently connected to self-esteem. Individuals derive intrinsic satisfaction from being perceived as successful, and this positive self‐evaluation reinforces their commitment to self‐promotional acts. In doing so, they secure external validation that not only boosts their self-image but also solidifies their standing within various social hierarchies. People do not just want to be seen as what they are, but also as what they aspire to be.
Read More: The Meaning of Self-Image for Girls
Healthy Alternatives to Showing Off
Psychological research also offers healthier pathways for addressing the underlying needs that drive showing off:
- Authentic self-expression: Genuinely sharing strengths and achievements without over-exaggeration helps build long-lasting connections.
- Practising gratitude: Focusing on appreciation rather than comparison.
- Mindfulness and self-compassion: By cultivating internal validation, individuals rely less on external approval.
- Promoting others: Redirecting attention to celebrating others’ achievements can create reciprocal respect.
These practices acknowledge the fundamental human need for validation while reducing reliance on manipulative self-presentation.
Read More: Mindfulness Meditation has a Positive Effect on Mental Health
Conclusion
The need to appear better is a product of evolutionary drives, social comparison, impression management, and cultural influences. While rooted in natural human desires for recognition and status, showing off often becomes distorted in modern contexts, especially under the influence of digital media.
At its best, self-presentation can be a tool for self-expression, professional advancement, and social bonding. At its worst, it can fuel narcissism, foster disconnection, and undermine genuine well-being. The challenge lies in balancing the universal need for validation with authentic and ethical forms of self-expression that promote not only personal growth but also meaningful human connection.
Read More: The Incensification of Narcissism in Modern Society
FAQs
1. Why do people feel the need to show off?
The urge to show off is rooted in status seeking, social comparison, and impression management. People want to gain approval, appear competent, and secure social influence, which often motivates them to highlight achievements or possessions.
2. How does social comparison influence showing-off behaviour?
According to social comparison theory, people evaluate themselves by comparing themselves with others. Upward comparisons (to those doing better) can trigger insecurity, while downward comparisons boost self-esteem. These comparisons often push individuals toward self-promotion and curated displays.
3. What role does social media play in amplifying show-off tendencies?
Platforms like Instagram and Facebook allow users to carefully curate idealised versions of themselves. Through filters, luxury displays, and lifestyle posts, people signal status and seek validation from likes and comments, reinforcing the cycle of self-promotion.
4. Are there gender differences in how showing off is perceived?
Yes. While self-promotion may be socially rewarded in men, women often face backlash due to cultural expectations around modesty and femininity. This double standard shapes how different genders navigate impression management.
5. Is showing off always negative?
Not entirely. While excessive or insincere self-promotion can lead to social backlash, some level of self-presentation helps build confidence, secure opportunities, and form identity. The key is balance, appearing competent without being perceived as arrogant.
References +
Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Wang, Y. (2016). Status seeking and manipulative self‐presentation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(4), 352–361.https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12153
Dinh, T.C.T., Lee, Y. (2025). Understanding the psychological drivers of online self-presentation: a survey study on social media exposure, social comparison, social network type and FOMO. BMC Psychol 13, 781. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03117-w
Lee, B. K., Suh, T., & Sierra, J. J. (2019). Understanding the Effects of Physical Images on Viewers in Social Comparison Contexts: A Multi-study Approach. Journal of Promotion Management, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2019.1612496
Taylor, D.G., Strutton, D. (2016). Does Facebook usage lead to conspicuous consumption?: The role of envy, narcissism and self-promotion. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. 10 (3): 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2015-0009
Sezer, O. (2022). Impression (mis)management: When what you say is not what they hear. Current Opinion in Psychology, Volume 44, Pages 31-37, ISSN 2352-250X.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.025
Swencionis, J. K., Dupree, C. H., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Warmth‐Competence Tradeoffs in Impression Management across Race and Social‐Class Divides. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12210
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629
Leave feedback about this