How the Amygdala Shapes Our Emotions and Behaviour

The limbic system is a complex array of brain structures responsible for extensive regulation of emotion, memory, and behaviour. Key structures include the amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and hypothalamus. The amygdala plays a pivotal role in the processing of emotion in response and sensory integration to guide behaviour. It’s extension from fear to other emotional processes, learning, and memory (Phelps & LeDoux, 2005).

A middle ground of higher-order cognitive processes in the neocortex and basic instincts, the limbic system determines decision-making and social conduct. The amygdala’s connections to cortical regions further modulate emotion-related information processing, which influences cognition and motor conduct (Gongora et al., 2019). The network exercises social and general personal regulation of emotion.

Amygdala Function in Emotion Regulation

The amygdala is a core point of emotional regulation in the limbic system that receives affective inputs and therefore provides for evoking goal-directed behavioural responses. Its projection to brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex and insula, modulates emotional responses context dependently. The amygdala subnuclei control other emotional processes; e.g., the basolateral amygdala controls conditioned threat responses, and the central nucleus initiates defensive behaviour.

It also controls feelings of happiness, anger, and sadness, and mood is controlled by neurotransmitters such as dopamine and serotonin. Dysregulation of this system can result in inappropriate emotional response, resulting in anxiety or PTSD (Phelps & LeDoux, 2005). Understanding of such processes might inform therapeutic strategies for emotional disorders.

Neuroanatomical Organisation of the Amygdala

1. Brain position and interconnectivity

The amygdala is a nuclear complex, the shape of an almond, buried in the medial temporal lobe of the brain, situated directly anterior to the hippocampus. It is a bilateral structure, having one amygdala per hemisphere, and it is perfectly placed to integrate sensory input with emotional output. Being a component of the limbic system, it is tasked with the processing of emotions and memory.

With extensive extension to numerous brain regions—most significantly the prefrontal cortex, significant in higher-order cognition and decision-making with emotional factors (Salzman & Britannica, 2025; Olivia Guy-Evans & Saul McLeod, 2025)—it also collaborates with areas such as the insula and orbital frontal cortex in enhancing emotional perception and social action. This intricate web of interaction allows it to manage negative and positive emotional inputs efficiently and, in turn, regulate behavioural reactions based on possible danger or reward in the environment.

2. Subnuclei and their functions

It is a complex structure composed of various subnuclei, each of which serves a specific purpose in the domain of emotional processing. Of all these, the basolateral amygdala (BLA) is the most critical, playing the role of monitoring the conditioned threat response development through consolidation of sensory cues to augment emotional responses. The subnucleus facilitates fear-congruent consolidation of memory to allow rapid learning under threatening conditions (Fox et al., 2015).

Also, the central amygdala (CeA) plays a primary link between basolateral regions and downstream targets, which trigger the physiological and behavioural response to threat. The nucleus plays a significant role in coordinating stress response and emotional behaviour, e.g., fear and anxiety (Fox et al., 2015). Apart from that, the medial amygdala is also engaged in processing pheromonal messages that have the potential to cause spontaneous emotional response, thereby affecting the regulation of social as well as sexual behaviour (Salzman & Britannica, 2025). Connectivity among these subnuclei allows them to function not individually but as part of a wide system, which enables adaptive response to impending as well as anticipated danger.

3. Interactions with other regions of the brain

The amygdala is also in essential interactions with other regions of the brain, that is, the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which is responsible for the regulation of emotional responses. The PFC has a top-down modulation of amygdala activity, hence solely defining emotion expression and regulation. A neat example is the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) engaged in fear extinction through the prevention of amygdala activation when presented with conditioned stimuli (Gongora et al., 2019). On the other hand, research has concluded that prefrontal regulatory areas’ dysfunction may cause over-emotional response, an indication of its critical role in controlling emotional stimuli (Javanbakht et al., 2015).

Furthermore, the amygdala also projects to other crucial areas such as the hippocampus and insula. These are involved in encoding and representation of emotional events in context. Research has proven that participants who have experienced child maltreatment exhibit various patterns of connectivity between the amygdala and these structures, and increased sensitivity to aversive stimuli (Harb et al., 2024). This hints at the significance of dynamic interaction among the amygdala and associated structures in the provision of successful emotional processing.

Neurobiological Processes of Emotion Processing

1. Modulation of emotional response by neurotransmitters

Modulation of neurotransmitters lies at the core of the amygdala’s control over emotional responses. Key neurotransmitters—i.e., dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine—are of central importance to the effect of modulation on the processing of emotions in this specific brain region. For example, dopamine has been linked to motivational state and reward processing; dysregulation of dopaminergic signalling has been linked to heightened experience of fear or anxiety in threat-related conditions.

Conversely, serotonin is charged with the role of being an active participant in mood stabilising and lowered levels of serotonin are most often associated with anxiety disorders and depressive conditions. That identification suggests that fluctuations in levels of serotonin influence the reactivity of the amygdala to stimuli of an emotional nature. Norepinephrine, on the other hand, possesses arousal and vigilance-enhancing qualities when responding to stressors and acts to activate the amygdala in fear responses.

This complex interaction between these neurotransmitters is what defines the multifaceted model of emotion regulation based on the amygdala. Moreover, neuroimaging research has also discovered that dysregulation of such neurotransmitter systems has been observed in the majority of such psychological conditions, such as PTSD and anxiety disorders. This leaves room for consideration of the potential for the targeting of such pathways in the aim of advancing therapeutic strategies towards the problems of emotional dysregulation (Yuan et al., 2025; Šimić et al., 2021).

2. Fear and reward processing: The neurocircuitry involved

The brain’s fear and reward circuitry interconnects the amygdala with various central brain structures, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and the insula. At the centre of emotional regulation response, especially for fear, the amygdala combines sensory information from the thalamus and initiates threat responses through projections to structures such as the hypothalamus and brainstem. Top-down regulation by the PFC shapes this network by regulating behavioural responses.

In particular, the medial PFC has the role to suppress hyperactivation of the amygdala in non-threatening situations, while dorsal ACC is involved in enabling the expression of fear when threat has been identified. When these networks are disrupted, over-heightened anxiety reactions may occur, e.g., diseases like PTSD, in which dysfunctional associations between the amygdala and PFC suppress optimal regulation of emotions (Yuan et al., 2025). Besides, research has also attested that successful emotional processing also relies on a fine balance between these interconnected brain areas in a bid to properly process threats and reward cues (Šimić etal al., 2021).

Fear Conditioning and Threat Detection

1. Mechanisms underlying fear conditioning

The amygdala plays a central role in the mechanism of fear conditioning, in which a previously neutral stimulus becomes a potential stimulus for producing a state of fear by virtue of its association with an aversive experience. The complex process starts when sensory information that corresponds to perceived threat is transmitted to the basolateral amygdala (BLA), which mediates associative fear learning.

The BLA is essentially responsible for determining the emotional value of the stimuli and the formation of such conditioned connections (Iqbal et al., 2023). Upon the perception of the threat, it activates the fight-or-flight response by its projections on the hypothalamus and brainstem, which causes automatic physiological reactions and facilitates the storage of emotional memory (Olivia Guy-Evans & Saul McLeod, 2025). Also, many neurotransmitter systems—particularly those that contain norepinephrine and dopamine—fine-tune these responses in a way that amplifies the emotional significance attached to memories (AbuHasan et al., 2023).

Neuroimaging has revealed increased amygdala activity during fear conditioning tasks in humans, affirming its status as an emotion sentinel that underlies experience-dependent behavioural reaction (LaBar et al., 1998). Through this complex neurobiological process, the amygdala allows living organisms to react impulsively towards threats based on their experience.

2. The role of the amygdala in threat detection and response activation

The amygdala is also a primary response-activating location and detector of threat as an alarm system for potential threats. It is receiving sensory information from the outside world, especially by the thalamus and sensory cortices, to gain a quick evaluation of potentially threatening stimuli. The amygdala then processes this information and elicits related behavioural and physiological responses, such as an increased heart rate and an increased arousal. This activation is controlled significantly by its central nucleus, which organises defensive behaviour like freezing or flight.

Literature shows that pathology within the amygdala might lead to heightened sensitivity to threat and heightened fear responses, particularly in disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Functional imaging scans have consistently implicated heightened amygdalar activity with patient symptomatology in PTSD, which implies that this heightened sensitivity can contribute to learning conditioned fear (Yuan et al., 2025). Additionally, lesions or damage to the amygdala have been reported to diminish the ability to form fear-conditioned associations, emphasising its critical role in emotional learning in relation to threat (Amygdala, 2025).

Consolidation of Emotional Memory

1. Amygdala-hippocampal relationship in memory formation

The amygdala and hippocampus are related structures engaged in memory formation, with specific reference to emotional experience. It interprets and processes affective response as well as consolidating memory, with its basolateral complex most involved in the coding of emotional memories (McGaugh, 2004). In emotional experiences, sensory stimuli interact with their affective value in the amygdala, influencing memory storage and retrieval.

The hippocampus supplies context, providing details of when and where things happened. It stimulation under affective states intensifies its interaction with the hippocampus, strengthening the retrieval of memory (Alkire et al., 2008). Interference with their interaction impedes memory consolidation, and it becomes challenging to remember significant events or differentiate contexts. They collaborate to strengthen the remembering and retrieval of emotions.

2. Impact on long-term emotional memories

The amygdala is central to the consolidation of short-term affective states into long-term memory, working in conjunction with the hippocampus. It consolidates memory more strongly through interaction with other structures of the brain, and emotional arousal ensures strong recall of emotionally negative experiences. Activation of the amygdala during strong emotion has been shown to enhance subsequent recall of such experiences (McGaugh, 2004; Phelps & Anderson, 1997).

The impact is brought about by modulation of neurotransmitters; stress hormones like epinephrine and glucocorticoids influence the basolateral complex of the amygdala, stabilising the memory process (Gongora et al., 2019). It enhances encoding and recall of memory through the provision of context information, which improves recollection of negative and positive experiences (Alkire et al., 2008; Hermans et al., 2014).

Social-Emotional Regulation Involving the Amygdala

1. The amygdala-prefrontal connection during regulation of social behaviour

Communication between the amygdala and mPFC plays a critical role in the modulation of social behaviour and emotion control. mPFC regulates amygdala emotional output, affecting social stimulus response. The interaction can be disrupted to cause a deficit in emotion control, commonly manifested in anxiety and mood disorders. mPFC top-down control is critical during social interaction when emotional nuance is most important.

Traumatised children have reduced interconnectivity in these areas, which compromises implicit emotion regulation and social wayfinding (McLaughlin & Lambert, 2017). Socioeconomic disparities also influence emotional response management (Javanbakht et al., 2015). Such insight into this network is of utmost importance for intervention planning in the development of social competence and affective well-being.

2. Influence on empathy, aggression, and social relationships

The amygdala is involved in the formation of social behaviours like aggression and empathy by compiling emotional responses to stimuli for an adequate response. Abnormally functioning amygdala people, i.e., autistic people, are found to be incapable of interpreting emotional cues, which affects their empathy (Zalla & Sperduti, 2013).

Aggression also involves the involvement of the amygdala, particularly the basolateral nucleus, which is involved in aggressive responses to threats. Hyperactive amygdala response to threatening situations could generate aggression, and impaired integration with the prefrontal cortex could undermine such impulses’ control (AbuHasan et al., 2023). Besides, there are sex differences in emotional processing that affect aggression and empathic behaviour, with females exerting higher amygdala and prefrontal cortex activity on emotion tasks (Zhang et al., 2021).

Psychopathology Associated with Amygdala Dysfunction

1. Lesion findings associated with anxiety disorders, PTSD, and depression

Lesion studies have significantly enhanced our understanding of amygdala dysfunction and its association with anxiety disorders, PTSD, and depression. Amygdala lesion patients are typically marked by the alteration of emotional responses, like flattened fear responses and disruption of the consolidation of the emotional memory, which can lead to disrupted threat detection accompanied by increased anxiety (Shin & Liberzon, 2009). Increased amygdala activity in PTSD goes hand in hand with hyperarousal and increased threat fear (Iqbal et al., 2023).

Hyperresponsiveness here is also contrasted with blunted medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) activity, which under normal conditions serves as an amygdala regulator. Such dissociation between the two is essential when talking about chronic PTSD symptoms (Yuan et al., 2025). Lesion studies also indicate that compromised amygdala connectivity to the mPFC could be involved in emotion dysregulation (Kredlow et al., 2021).

2. Psychopathology influence of emotional dysregulation

Amygdala impairment is critical to account for emotional dysregulation across most psychopathologies. Generalised anxiety disorder and PTSD patients exhibit increased amygdala activity when subjected to emotional stimuli, leading to overactivation of fear (Zhang et al., 2021). This hyper-responsivity is coupled with abnormally altered connectivity between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex, which is an important region in regulating emotions (Zhang et al., 2021).

Meanwhile, major depressive disorder patients exhibit disrupted connectivity patterns between the amygdala and prefrontal regions during emotion processing (Zhang et al., 2021). The patient S.M., who could not feel fear but could conceive it, points to the distinction between affective experience and cognitive awareness (Šimić et al., 2021). Knowledge of its circuits may be a clue to how to handle emotional dysregulation.

Clinical and Therapeutic Implications of Amygdala Research

1. Treatment strategies derived from amygdala function

Treatment of emotional illnesses due to dysfunction of the amygdala generally involves measures to promote more regulation of greater emotions and decrease the hyperactivity of the respective brain region. Exposure therapy is a classic intervention in which therapists gradually expose the individual to threatening stimuli under controlled conditions. The respective procedure promotes extinction of conditioned fear responses and thus increased regulation of emotions (Kredlow et al., 2021). Moreover, mindfulness practices—i.e., meditation and guided breathing—are useful in calming the hyperarousal of the amygdala.

The practice enables people to have improved regulation and observation of their emotional responses (Holland, 2019). Another effective intervention is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), which is prone to shifting maladaptive ideation and action associated with anxiety disorders by increasing the regulation of the prefrontal cortex over the amygdala (Zhang et al., 2021). In addition, neuromodulation methods like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been proposed as some of the possible options through which the neural circuitry employed for emotion processing can be modified. Such developments will probably assist in refining the therapy intervention for disorders such as PTSD.

2. Future directions for research on therapeutic interventions of amygdala pathways

Future research is needed to examine the amygdala’s neural role in emotional dysregulation and its interaction with other brain regions. Amygdala-prefrontal cortex interaction is key to emotional regulation and may inform more effective interventions. Increased connectivity is the course for research in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety, especially in PTSD. Researchers may seek neurotransmitter modulation through experiments designed to guide pharmacological treatment of the amygdala systems.

Chronic stress impacts on amygdala function might provide the basis for new treatments. Neuroimaging can detect abnormal connectivity patterns in psychiatric illness, optimising treatments like exposure therapy. Behaviour therapies combined with neuromodulation may also enhance outcomes. Implicit emotion regulation tasks remain under-explored. Future research will apply diverse methods in the development of personalised therapeutic interventions for amygdala-mediated dysfunctions.

References +

Elizabeth A. Phelps, Joseph E. LeDoux. (2005). Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behaviour. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627305008238

Qais AbuHasan, Vamsi Reddy, Waquar Siddiqui. (2023). Neuroanatomy, Amygdala. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537102/

Amygdala. (2025). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdala

Olivia Guy-Evans. MSc, Saul McLeod. PhD. (2025). Amygdala: What It Is & Its Functions. https://www.simplypsychology.org/amygdala.html

Javanbakht. Arash, Angstadt. Michael, Swain. James E. Evans. Gary W., Liberzon. Israel, Phan. K. Luan, King. Anthony P. (2015). Frontiers | Childhood Poverty Predicts Adult Amygdala and Frontal Activity and Connectivity in Response to Emotional Faces. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00154/full

Ti-Fei Yuan, Ting Wang, Shuoshuo Li, Pengfei Wei, Liping Wang, Bingxing Pan, Ji Hu, Shengxi Wu, Yuan Shen, Zengqiang Yuan, Haitao Wu. (2025). Innovating transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder: Zapping away the bad memory. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667325825004686

Iqbal. Javed, Yang. Mei, Xue. Yan-Xue, Huang. Geng-Di, Jia. Xiao-Jian. (2023). Frontiers | The neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying fear dysregulation in posttraumatic stress disorder. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1281401/full

Andrew S Fox, Jonathan A Oler, Do PM Tromp. (2015). Extending the amygdala in theories of threat processing. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4417372/

Goran Šimić, Mladenka Tkalčić, Vana Vukić, Damir Mulc, Ena Španić. (2021). Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8228195/

Alkire. Michael T., Gruver. Robin, Miller. Jason Cahill. Larry Hahn. Emily L. McReynolds. Jayme R. (2008). Neuroimaging analysis of an anaesthetic gas that blocks human emotional memory | PNAS. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0711651105

C. Daniel Salzman, The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2025). Amygdala | Definition, Function, Location, & Facts | Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/amygdala

Kevin S LaBar, J. Christopher Gatenby, John C Gore, Joseph E LeDoux, Elizabeth A Phelps. (1998). Human Amygdala Activation during Conditioned Fear Acquisition and Extinction: a Mixed-Trial fMRI Study. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627300804754

James L McGaugh. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15217324/

Elizabeth A. Phelps, Adam K. Anderson. (1997). Emotional memory: What does the amygdala do?. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982206001461

Wen-Hua Zhang, Jun-Yu Zhang, Andrew Holmes, Bing-Xing Pan. (2021). Amygdala Circuit Substrates for Stress Adaptation and Adversity. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006322321000354

M. Alexandra Kredlow, Robert J. Fenster, Emma S. Laurent, Kerry J. Ressler, Elizabeth A. Phelps. (2021). Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-021-01155-7

Stella Berboth, Carmen Morawetz. (2021). Amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during emotion regulation: A meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002839322100018X

Erno J Hermans, Francesco P Battaglia, Piray Atsak, Lycia D de Voogd, Guillén Fernández, Benno Roozendaal. (2014). How the amygdala affects emotional memory by altering brain network properties. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24583373/

Farah Harb, Michael T. Liuzzi, Ashley A. Huggins, E. Kate Webb, Jacklynn M. Fitzgerald, Jessica L. Krukowski, Terri A. deRoon-Cassini, Christine L. Larson. (2024). Childhood Maltreatment and Amygdala-Mediated Anxiety and Posttraumatic Stress Following Adult Trauma. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174324000259

Aubry. Antonio V., Burghardt. Nesha S., Serrano. Peter A. (2016). Frontiers | Molecular Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Increases in Fear Memory Consolidation within the Amygdala. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00191/full

Kimberly Holland. (2019). Amygdala Hijack: What It Is, Why It Happens & How to Make It Stop. https://www.healthline.com/health/stress/amygdala-hijack

Lisa M Shin, Israel Liberzon. (2009). The Neurocircuitry of Fear, Stress, and Anxiety Disorders. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3055419/

Katie A McLaughlin, Hilary K Lambert. (2017). Child Trauma Exposure and Psychopathology: Mechanisms of Risk and Resilience. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5111863/

Zalla. Tiziana Sperduti. Marco. (2013). Frontiers | The amygdala and the relevance detection theory of autism: an evolutionary perspective. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00894/full