Typically, when passing through a retail establishment, one pays little attention to the display mannequins. For the most part, almost all of them share a common set of characteristics; they are generally very slender, stand tall, have a symmetrical appearance and are frozen in perfect poses. They manage to silently communicate to the consumers who belong in that space and who do not.
For decades, retail mannequins have reflected a narrow idea of the “ideal” body, able-bodied, youthful and conventionally attractive. Historically, disability has not been visible; in fact, for the most part, this type of mannequin did not exist. Recently, however, a gradual shift is beginning to take place. Some retailers are beginning to introduce mannequin products with some sort of mobility assistance, for example, a wheelchair or prosthetic limbs or other forms of alternate physicality. These are not huge changes; however, there does appear to be some evidence to support the premise that the inclusion of such products in store windows may be more important than most people realise.
Why Are Mannequins So Important?
Mannequins may not seem like a big deal, but they act as important visual representations of particular social expectations. Studies conducted related to retail and consumer behaviour show that mannequins provide an implicit definition of the standard of beauty and normality, both of which impact shoppers’ self-image and how they perceive others (Argo, Dahl, & Peracchio, 2018).
When consumers are frequently exposed to the same image as the “ideal” body, it strengthens the view that there is a single definition of “normal,” “beautiful,” or “acceptable.” Therefore, anyone whose body doesn’t look like the displayed mannequin is automatically cast as an “outsider.” For example, previous research has shown that the use of an idealised or perfect mannequin negatively affects the self-perception of consumers who feel physically different from the displayed norm (Argo et al., 2018).
For consumers who have a disability, the lack of any representation anywhere sends the message that this society does not consider them in the design of that space. Inclusive mannequins flip this narrative on its head by doing something incredibly radical: they are prominently displaying disability rather than making a spectacle out of it.
Disability and the Issue of Invisibility
If we are to understand why inclusive displays are important, we must look at how society treats disability in a public context. According to disability scholars, not only are people with disabilities excluded physically from participating in or using a place (due to things like a lack of ramps), but also symbolically, it demonstrates society’s decision about who can participate in public spaces and who needs to be hidden from view.
The social model of disability indicates that, in addition to physical impairments, other forms of barriers (social and environmental) create limitations on the ability of individuals to participate in the community (Oliver, 1990). In this view, a store without representation is not neutral; it actively contributes to exclusion.
Retail environments are particularly important because they serve as shared public spaces. A study by Baker, Holland and Kaufman-Scarborough (2007) indicates that how people with disabilities interpret their surroundings through environmental cues such as physical layout, signage and visual displays will dictate whether they feel welcomed into that particular business. Environmental signals of exclusion can evoke feelings of discomfort, self-consciousness or lead to complete avoidance of that space. Other than functioning as a decorative piece, mannequins are an integral component of the servicescape and should be considered in relation to the overall customer experience.
What Inclusive Mannequins Actually Do
Inclusive mannequins do not “fix” disability, nor do they need to. Their impact lies in normalisation. According to research, regularly being exposed to individuals with marginalised identities, through non-dramatic means, reduces stigma and increases the level of acceptance of a marginalised person in our society (Nesbitt 2025). When we see a mannequin in a wheelchair, or with a prosthetic limb:
- Disability becomes ordinary, not exceptional
- Shoppers are reminded that disabled people participate in everyday life
- The difference is presented without pity or inspirational framing
This matters because society often portrays disability in extremes, either as tragedy or heroism. Retail displays, when done thoughtfully, offer the third option of normalcy. Sung, Yan and Kissell (2025) found that consumers associate diverse mannequins with inclusivity, fairness and social responsibility. Importantly, this positive perception extended beyond disabled shoppers. Non-disabled consumers also viewed inclusive displays more favorably, suggesting broader cultural benefits.
Read More: The Importance of Inclusive Education for Students
Feeling Welcome
For people with disabilities, representation can be emotionally validating. Baker et al. (2007) showed that feeling “welcome” in retail environments is linked to reduced anxiety, increased comfort and greater willingness to engage with the space. Inclusive mannequins contribute to this sense of welcome by signalling: You are seen; You belong here; Your body is not an afterthought
Qualitative research on disabled consumers’ clothing experiences highlights how exclusion goes beyond product availability. Kim et al. (2025) reported that the majority of the disabled population feel overlooked by mainstream fashion, not only because clothes may not fit their needs, but because marketing rarely acknowledges their existence.
However, viewing disabled mannequins in appealing clothing for daily wear provides a counter-narrative to the belief that no style, desire or self-expression can exist for people with disabilities.
Representation Without Tokenism
One common concern is whether inclusive mannequins become tokenistic, added for appearance rather than genuine inclusion. Research suggests that context matters. When inclusive mannequins are integrated naturally into displays, styled similarly to other mannequins, and positioned prominently rather than hidden. They are more likely to be perceived as authentic (Sung et al., 2025).
Tokenism occurs when representation appears isolated or performative. For instance, using a single disabled mannequin only during a campaign focused on raising awareness. True normalisation occurs when the inclusion of a diverse audience becomes commonplace, rather than an exception. It aligns with the principles of universal and inclusive design. The environment has to be designed from inception with all types of users in mind and not designed for one type and made accessible to others after the fact (Story, Mueller, & Mace, 1998).
Changing Social Norms Through Everyday Exposure
The most compelling thing about inclusive mannequins, however, is that their value is in their subtlety. Even though advertising directly promotes diversity and inclusion, the mannequin plays an indirect role via consistent and repeated exposure. Research indicates that frequent access to something, in a context free from any specific agenda, attitude, or circumstance, can reduce issues related to discomfort and bias (Zajonc, 1968). Given enough time, items once perceived as abnormal become commonplace. By placing disabled bodies in everyday consumer spaces, stores contribute to:
- Reduced social awkwardness around disability
- Greater acceptance of bodily diversity
- Shifts in what society considers “normal”
Nesbitt (2025) argues that visibility alone is not enough, but visibility without distortion or exaggeration is a powerful first step.
Business Benefits Without Exploiting Disability
Other than the social and psychological impact, it is worth noting that inclusive displays are not bad for business. With DEI becoming increasingly important in retail, consumers are beginning to prefer to buy from brands that provide evidence of their commitment to social Inclusion (Sung et al., 2025). Research suggests that:
- Inclusive mannequins do not alienate non-disabled shoppers
- They can improve brand perception and trust
- They signal modern, ethical brand values
However, ethical responsibility must come before marketing advantage. Disability representation should not serve as a trend or branding strategy disconnected from genuine inclusion, such as accessible stores, adaptive clothing, or respectful staff training.
Why These Silent Figures Matter
Sometimes, social change does not arrive loudly. At times, it stands silently behind glass, wearing a jacket, holding a bag and reminding us that all bodies belong. There is no doubt that, while there is no single factor responsible for ending ableism, mannequins represent one of the many factors that contribute to bringing about change regarding how society accepts those with disabilities, in all walks of life. The use of mannequins to depict a broad spectrum of people challenges the outdated view that disability belongs only in hospitals, charity campaigns and inspirational stories.
By standing in store windows, disabled mannequins quietly ask: Why should this body be surprising? Over time, these small disruptions create a cumulative impact. They help reshape our beliefs about how we think of society, the role of an individual, and expand our understanding of what public spaces are for. In a time when disability is still too often hidden, inclusive displays quietly yet profoundly show that being different requires no justification.
References +
Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Peracchio, L. A. (2018). Standards of beauty: The impact of mannequins in the retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 974–990. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx072
Baker, S. M., Holland, J., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2007). How consumers with disabilities perceive “welcome” in retail servicescapes: A critical incident study. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040710746508
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2016). Disability and social media: Global perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585048
Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2025). Toward inclusivity through fashion: A qualitative exploration of the clothing consumption experiences of physically disabled men. Fashion and Textiles, 12, Article 16. https://fashionandtextiles.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40691-025-00425-y
Nesbitt, R. (2025). The paradox of visibility: Disability inclusion in fashion media and runways. Unravelling Fashion Narratives, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.38055/UFN050105
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
Story, M. F., Mueller, J. L., & Mace, R. L. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. North Carolina State University, Centre for Universal Design. https://projects.ncsu.edu/design/cud/pubs_p/docs/UD_File.pdf
Sung, J., Yan, R.-N., & Kissell, K. (2025). Visual merchandising in fashion retail: The diversity, equity, and inclusion perspective. Fashion, Style & Popular Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00291_1
The Guardian. (2002, August 14). Disabled mannequins challenge perceptions of disability. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/aug/14/disability.guardiansocietysupplement
The Guardian. (2023, April 25). “I have an invisible disability myself”: Edward Enninful and Sinéad Burke on their fashion revolution. https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2023/apr/25/i-have-an-invisible-disability myself-edward-enninful-and-sinead-burke-on-their-fashion-revolution
Vogue Business. (2025, January 5). The ultimate adaptive fashion playbook. https://www.voguebusiness.com/fashion/the-ultimate-adaptive-fashion-playbook
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
