Let’s not sugarcoat it: cocaine addiction breaks people. You’d think after months clean, the worst is over. It’s not. Six out of ten people still relapse. Six. That number haunts every addiction researcher. For years, we obsessed over dopamine—the brain’s “reward highway” that cocaine hijacks. But staring at those relapse stats? Feels like we’ve been studying a forest fire by only examining matches. What if we’ve missed the smoke? That’s what drives Yonatan Kupchik’s lab at Hebrew University right now. He and his PhD student, Liran Levi, are chasing a darker thread: the brain’s anti-reward system.
Think about it:
- Withdrawal isn’t just the absence of pleasure
- It’s active punishment
- A crushing wave of dysphoria
- Anxiety that claws your ribs
That’s the anti-reward system in action—evolution’s blunt tool to stop harmful behaviour. Kupchik’s team suspects this primal circuit becomes cocaine’s unwitting ally. Every day, clean? The anti-reward system might dial up suffering until relapse feels like survival.
This changes everything: Not just “how pleasure hooks us, ” but “how pain traps us”
Their experiments are mapping this shadow network neuron by neuron. It’s gruelling work. But if they’re right? We might finally understand why quitting is only half the battle…
…and why so many brilliant, resilient people whisper “I thought I’d beaten it” before crumbling.
Read More: Addiction Psychology and Relapse Prevention: Trauma-Informed Approaches to Substance Use Disorders
Key Concepts and Literature Review
The conventional model of cocaine addiction emphasises reward processing dysfunction, where repeated drug exposure leads to tolerance and increased craving for the euphoric effects (Robinson & Berridge, 2008). However, emerging theories propose that negative emotional states during withdrawal may be equally important in maintaining addiction cycles (Koob & Le Moal, 2008).
This perspective aligns with the opponent-process theory, which suggests that the brain develops compensatory mechanisms to counteract drug-induced euphoria, resulting in negative emotional states when the drug is absent (Solomon & Corbit, 1974). The ventral pallidum, traditionally known for its role in reward processing (Volkow et al., 2009), contains a distinct glutamatergic network that appears to mediate aversive emotional experiences.
This “anti-reward” system has received limited attention in addiction research, despite growing evidence that negative emotional states—rather than simply the pursuit of pleasure—may be primary drivers of relapse behaviour. Understanding this circuit could fundamentally reshape how we approach addiction treatment.
Read More: Research: How Addictive Drugs can Hijack Brain’s Reward System
Method and Approach
The research team at Hebrew University’s IMRIC Centre for Addiction Research employed neurobiological techniques to investigate glutamatergic neuron activity within the ventral pallidum. The study examined neural activity across three critical phases of cocaine use: active drug consumption, withdrawal periods, and drug re-exposure. While specific methodological details were not fully disclosed, the approach appears to have involved both observational analysis of natural neural activity patterns and experimental manipulation of the anti-reward circuit to determine its functional significance.
Findings and Results
The study revealed several groundbreaking findings that challenge conventional understanding of addiction mechanisms. Most significantly, researchers discovered that the anti-reward network in the ventral pallidum becomes hyperactive during abstinence periods, correlating with intensified emotional discomfort and distress. This hyperactivation appears to motivate individuals to seek cocaine not primarily for its euphoric effects, but rather as a means of escaping the psychological pain associated with withdrawal.
Perhaps most intriguingly, the study uncovered a dual function of the anti-reward system. When researchers experimentally inhibited this circuit, subjects demonstrated increased drug preference and heightened motivation for cocaine consumption. This counterintuitive finding suggests that the anti-reward network may serve as a protective mechanism, functioning as an internal regulatory system that limits excessive drug use under normal circumstances.
The research also revealed dynamic connectivity patterns between the anti-reward circuit and other brain regions involved in emotional regulation. During withdrawal, network connectivity strengthened, potentially amplifying negative emotional experiences. Conversely, when subjects were re-exposed to cocaine, these connections weakened, corresponding with temporary relief from aversive states.
Read More: Sierra Leone Declares National Emergency to Combat ‘Zombie Drug’ Crisis
Critical Analysis and Discussion
These findings represent a paradigm shift in addiction neuroscience, moving beyond the traditional focus on reward suppression to highlight the critical role of aversion modulation. The discovery that emotional pain—rather than craving—may be the primary driver of relapse has profound implications for treatment approaches. Current therapeutic strategies that focus primarily on blocking reward pathways may be missing a crucial component of addiction maintenance.
The dual nature of the anti-reward system presents both opportunities and challenges for therapeutic development. While targeting withdrawal-associated negative affect could reduce relapse vulnerability, the system’s protective function against excessive drug consumption must be preserved. This complexity suggests that successful interventions will require nuanced approaches that can selectively modulate negative emotional states without compromising the circuit’s adaptive regulatory capacity.
However, several limitations warrant consideration. The study does not fully elucidate the specific molecular mechanisms underlying anti-reward circuit function, limiting immediate therapeutic applications. Additionally, the generalizability of these findings to other substances of abuse remains unclear, as different drugs may interact with this system in varying ways.
Read More: A new light-activated drug can induce Sleep without any harmful effect
Conclusion
This research fundamentally challenges our understanding of cocaine addiction by demonstrating that the anti-reward circuit in the ventral pallidum plays a central role in relapse through its mediation of withdrawal-associated negative emotional states. The finding that this system serves both as a relapse trigger and a protective mechanism highlights the complexity of addiction neurobiology and suggests that effective treatments must address the emotional pain of withdrawal, not just the pursuit of euphoria.
By expanding addiction neuroscience to include aversion pathways alongside traditional reward mechanisms, this study opens new avenues for therapeutic development. Future treatments that focus on alleviating negative affective states during withdrawal, while preserving the anti-reward system’s protective functions, may prove more effective than current approaches. This research represents a crucial step toward more comprehensive and nuanced addiction interventions that address the full spectrum of neurobiological factors contributing to this devastating disorder.
References +
Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2008). Addiction and the brain’s antireward system. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 29-53.
Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: A neurocircuitry analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 760-773.
Levi, L. A., Kupchik, Y. M., et al. (2025). A ventral pallidal glutamatergic aversive network encodes abstinence from and re-exposure to cocaine. Science Advances, 11(3), adu6074.
Marx, D. (2025, July). Emotional Pain Brain Circuit Drives Cocaine Relapse. Neuroscience News. Retrieved from https://neurosciencenews.com/emotional-pain-cocaine-addiction-29517/
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitisation theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363(1507), 3137-3146.
Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81(2), 119-145.
Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., Wang, G. J., Baler, R., & Telang, F. (2009). Imaging dopamine’s role in drug abuse and addiction. Neuropharmacology, 56, 3-8.
